USPTO serial 74068954
LEAN 'N FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 1992
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEAN 'N FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Kritek
JAMES J KRITEK SWIFT-ECKRICH, INC2001 BUTTERFIELD RDDOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515-1049UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed meats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 13, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |