USPTO serial 74069194
FRESH FROM THE DELI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 21, 1992
- Examiner
- KNIGHT, LISA L.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESH FROM THE DELI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Downers Grove, IL
Downers Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Kritek
JAMES J KRITEK SWIFT-ECKRICH, INC2001 BUTTERFIELD RDDOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515-1049UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed meats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 13, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1991 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |