Drawing for CINEMA 5

USPTO serial 74069550

CINEMA 5

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUPO, ANTHONY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CINEMA 5?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin C. Soffen

MARVIN C SOFFEN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038radio and television broadcasting servicesABANDONED—
041arranging and conducting athletic competitions and rallies; motion picture equipment rental services; cinema studio and production services; motion picture, radio, television and theatrical production services; educational services; namely, conducting classes and seminars in the fields of art history, construction drafting, languages, acting; motion picture directing and scriptwriting services; camp servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 1995ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
May 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 1994SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 18, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 9, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 19, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 6, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 4, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 27, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance