Drawing for Serial No. 74069761

USPTO serial 74069761

Serial No. 74069761

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74069761?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Welter

PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010blood pumpsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 16, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 16, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 2, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 25, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 5, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 7, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance