USPTO serial 74070280
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip T. Mitches
PHILIP T MITCHES MITCHES & CO1017 RIDGE RDAMBRIDGE, PA 15003UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | area deodorizer for agricultural and industrial applications | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |