USPTO serial 74070365
PACIFIC BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1898217Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 1995
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PACIFIC BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA A. FRIEDMAN
BARBARA A. FRIEDMAN EDELL,SHAPIRO & FINNAN LLC9801 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 750Gaithersburg, MD 20878UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat and/or poultry and/or seafood, frozen vegetables, frozen fruits, and frozen or refrigerated soups | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 22, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |