Drawing for VLSIPS

USPTO serial 74070856

VLSIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VLSIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Lynn Perry

E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001diagnostic reagents for scientific research purposesABANDONED—
005diagnostic reagents for medical research purposes; diagnostic test kits comprised of reagents, processing chemicals, and solid materials; namely, patches, slides and substrates derivatised with polymers, such as oligosaccharides, polypeptides, or oligonucleotides, for medical research purposesABANDONED—
009apparatus for screening chemicals for making molecular arrays and for measuring patterns and accessories thereforABANDONED—
042research and product development services for others in the field of chemicals and reagents for use as diagnostics, therapeutics, herbicides, cytotoxic agents, and other utilities, and chemical screening and diagnostic services for othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 1996EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 1995EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 5, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 25, 1995EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 14, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 2, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 1994EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 5, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 25, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 2, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 29, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance