USPTO serial 74073016
STONY HILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STONY HILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THOMAS HARDY & SONS PROPRIETARY LIMITED
Reynella, State of South Australia, AU
Other trademarks owned by THOMAS HARDY & SONS PROPRIETARY LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold C. Wegner
HAROLD C WEGNER WEGNER, CANTOR, MUELLER & PLAYERP O BOX 18218WASHINGTON, DC 20036-8218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 1992 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |