Drawing for INNOVATIVE DESIGN

USPTO serial 74073199

INNOVATIVE DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATIVE DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy T. Patula

TIMOTHY T PATULA WELSH & KATZ, LTD135 S LASALLE STSTE 1625CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011bathtubs and bathtub enclosuresABANDONEDFeb 17, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 4, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 4, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 12, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 2, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 24, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 23, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance