Drawing for TOXO AND NUKE, THE WASTE BROTHERS

USPTO serial 74073791

TOXO AND NUKE, THE WASTE BROTHERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOXO AND NUKE, THE WASTE BROTHERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joe L. Hecker

JOE L HECKER RUSSO & BURKE747 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009pre-recorded motion picture films, video tapes, audio tapes, phonograph records and compact discs featuring entertainment and educational material, and pre-recorded computer software for use in the field of entertainment and educationABANDONED—
016paper products; namely, children's and ecologically oriented books, comics books and strips, children's and ecologically oriented magazines, stationery, notebooks, writing pads, post-cards, paper flags, greeting cards and garbage bags, stickers and rubber stampsABANDONED—
025clothing; namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts and sweatpants, robes, sweaters, jackets, vests, head wear and scarvesABANDONED—
028toys; namely, board games, computer game programs, and dollsABANDONED—
041entertainment and educational services; namely, the production of television shows, films, videos, audio tapes, phonograph records and compact discs, and the publication of books and other printed matterABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 1, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 8, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 7, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance