USPTO serial 74073991
STANLEY US
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STANLEY US?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machinery; tooling and die molding and stamping presses | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electrical and scientific apparatus; electronic and scientific apparatus, namely, diodes, light emitting diodes, electroluminescence device, transistors, phototransistors, selenium rectifiers, resistors, fuses, voltage regulators, electornic welders, electroplating apparatus for forming super hard coatings on surface of a molding die, electric apparatus for removing molten solder from a soldered joint, ultrasonic abrasive apparatus, switches, replays and photorelays, electronic cigar lighters, photographic strobe lights, electricdisplay, operator panel and other components for use in vehicle, office equipment and industrial equipment, light meters for measuring and fixing a shutter speed or diaphram of cameras, liquid crystal displays for motor vehicles and electronic equipment, electronic photoreceptors, noise supressors, electrophotographic erasers, electronic power supplies for microcomputer equipment, office automation equipment, communication and numerically controlled equipment, railway signals, image scanners, liquid level meters | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | medical apparatus; medical instruments and apparatus, namely, oximeters | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | environmental control apparatus; motorcycle and automotive electric lamps, namely, side marker lights, fog lights, sealed beam head lights and bulbs, search lights, tail lights, spot lights, backup lights, license plate lights, brake stop lights, pole lights, electric lights and electric light bulbs, electric bulbs and halogen bulbs, discharge lamps, automotive lamps, lenses and reflectors, flood lights, flourescent lamps, specialized light bulbs for scientific applications | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | vehicles; spoilers for automotive vehicles, directional indicators, vehicles consisting of acuators, warning and indicator lights | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stanley Electric Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named STANLEY US
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1991 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |