USPTO serial 74074072
BOSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westmount, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor L. Moskowitz
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET AL400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | food service equipment; namely, commercial automatic fryers and oil and air filters, automatic freezer dispensers, commercial baking equipment; namely, ovens | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail distributorship services; namely, installation of food service equipment for use by commerical food preparers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1994 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |