USPTO serial 74074685
SABRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SABRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Connors
JOHN J CONNORS PLANTE, STRAUSS, VANDERBURGH & CONNORS1020 N BROADWAYSTE 305SANTA ANA, CA 92701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | seat track fittings for passenger seats used in land and airborne vehicles, lavatory systems and components thereof used in the lavatories of land and airborne vehicles, latches used in land and airborne vehicles, fasteners used in land and airborne vehicles, valves for water systems used in land and airborne vehicles, manually operated cable controls used in land and airborne vehicles, and breathing regulators and devices used in land and airborne vehicles | ABANDONED | May 2, 1963 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |