CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TRANSITCENTER

USPTO serial 74075004

TRANSITCENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1930353Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 1995
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TRANSITCENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK N. MUTTERPERL

MARK N MUTTERPERL FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042fostering and promoting the public's use and awareness of public transportationSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 29, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2020CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 5, 2005RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 5, 200589AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 5, 2005PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 200589AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Nov 22, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2001C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 13, 2000815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 31, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1994UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 1994ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 21, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance