USPTO serial 74075319
BOTTLESACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 1993
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOTTLESACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Gurnick
DAVID GURNICK KINDEL & ANDERSON5959 TOPANGA CANYON BLVDWOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | grocery bags made of recycled material consisting of post consumer material; namely, plastic bottles and plastic containers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 19, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 1991 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |