USPTO serial 74075745
MONSTER IN MY POCKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONSTER IN MY POCKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI N BOATRIGHT
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded audio tapes, video tapes, phonograph records and compact discs composed of stories and music primarily for children | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |