USPTO serial 74075930
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth H. Schoettly
ELIZABETH H SCHOETTLY THE LAW FIRM OF RONALD LEE ENGELSTE 1020333 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | rice, processed grains for human consumption | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |