USPTO serial 74075987
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONNA L BERRY
DONNA L BERRY YOUNG & BASILE3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture; namely, seating for theaters, auditoriums, stadiums, cinemas, arenas, classrooms, conference rooms and similar facilities | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1997 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |