USPTO serial 74076704
ROBOT CADDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1759273Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 1993
- Examiner
- LERNER, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROBOT CADDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward A. Sokolski
HOBART S LEYSON2133 STONEWOOD CTSAN PEDRO, CA 90732UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | remote controlled motorized golf cart | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 25, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1998 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |