USPTO serial 74076798
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas C. Miller
THOMAS C MILLER WELAJ AND MILLER21 N BRIDGE STP O BOX 1034SOMERVILLE, NJ 08876| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the sale of goods and services of others through the issuance and redemption of coupons that may be redeemed for travel and vacations | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |