USPTO serial 74077469
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Laurent, province of Quebec, CA
St. Laurent, province of Quebec, CA
St. Laurent, province of Quebec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
CHARLES N QUINN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL AND SKILLMAN1601 MARKET ST - STE 720PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | application software intended to be sold to distributors, dealers and users of digital voice and automated telephoning systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |