USPTO serial 74078316
NAIL DRENCHER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAIL DRENCHER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay K. Malkin
JAY K MALKIN KLAAS & LAW1999 BROADWAY STE 2225DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | fingernail polish | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |