USPTO serial 74078577
GOLFSPURS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLFSPURS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip H. Smith, Esq.
PHILLIP H SMITH MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | overshoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |