USPTO serial 74078711
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Berliner
201 N FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90012UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting classes and seminars in the field of dealing with bereavement | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 30, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |