USPTO serial 74078740
BODACIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BODACIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Helena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M. Schwab
GEORGE M SCHWAB TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |