Drawing for BLADE

USPTO serial 74078802

BLADE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FEISTHAMEL, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLADE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles A. Mays

CHARLES A MAYS LEONARD, ST AND DEINARDSTE 2300150 S FIFTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028in-line roller skates comprising boots with a plurality of longitudinally aligned wheelsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 19, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance