USPTO serial 74079212
BIOTHERM BIOPERFECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 1993
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOTHERM BIOPERFECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Monte Carlo, MC
Monte Carlo, MC
Monte Carlo, MC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell H. Falconer
RUSSELL H FALCONER BAKER & BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | makeup; namely, foundation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |