USPTO serial 74079438
CBC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CBC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN S. FRANK
KAREN S FRANK PILLSBURY, MADISON & SUTROP O BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | brokerage services in the field of real estate and mortgages; mortgage banking services; real estate appraisal services; real estate management services; real estate investment banking services; real estate portfolio management and disposition services; real estate capital management services; securities brokerage services; financial services in the nature of securities investment | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | real estate development and real estate development management services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | real estate consultation services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CB Commercial Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CB Commercial Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CBC
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |