USPTO serial 74079595
NASSAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NASSAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bucheun City Kyeong Gi Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Armstrong
JAMES E ARMSTRONG ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, ET ALSTE 10001725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | sports shoes, namely golf shoes, tennis shoes, football shoes, running shoes, gymnastics shoes, basketball shoes and volleyball shoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |