Drawing for PEYOTE

USPTO serial 74079753

PEYOTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VLCEK, TOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PEYOTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Gilmore

Douglas W. Gilmore International Flora Technologies, Ltd.291 East El Prado CourtChandler, AZ 85225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely men's cologne, aftershave, moisturizing lotion, and eau de toiletteABANDONEDApr 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 1992ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 27, 1992OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 12, 1992OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 26, 1991OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance