Drawing for PRECISIONLINE 800

USPTO serial 74080021

PRECISIONLINE 800

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CONWAY, JAYNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PRECISIONLINE 800?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth F. Janda

ELIZABETH F JANDA BROOKS & KUSHMAN1000 TOWN CTRTWENTY-SECOND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunication servicesABANDONEDJun 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 1992OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 1, 1992ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 1, 1992OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance