USPTO serial 74080873
SECURITY POLYMER GROUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1657422Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 1991
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SECURITY POLYMER GROUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc.
Pompano Beach, FL
Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc.
Pompano Beach, FL
Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc.
Pompano Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H OLTMAN
JOHN H OLTMAN OLTMAN FLYNN & KUBLER915 MIDDLE RIVER DR #415FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304-3585UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | GROUTING MATERIALS, NAMELY, COLORED POLYMER GROUT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SECURITY POLYMER GROUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 17, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2002 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 6, 1997 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |