USPTO serial 74081015
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | feeds and food stuffs for animals, birds and fish; animal food additives for non-nutritional purposes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |