Drawing for SPILLERS PRIME

USPTO serial 74081015

SPILLERS PRIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPILLERS PRIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031feeds and food stuffs for animals, birds and fish; animal food additives for non-nutritional purposesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 12, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 31, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance