USPTO serial 74081444
GOLDEN CREEK RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1978599Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 4, 1996
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOLDEN CREEK RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD HUBBARD, THURMAN, TURNER, TUCKER, ET ALONE GALLERIA TWR13355 NOEL RD STE 2100DALLAS, TX 75240-6604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | bacon rinds, chili, dried chili peppers, conserves, dried fruit, processed fruit, fruit based filling for cakes and pies, fruit toppings, nut toppings, fruit preserves, jams, jellies, jerky, lemon curd, lentils, marmalade, mayonnaise, meat, mincemeat, mixtures of processed fruits and processed nuts, non-dairy based snack dips, processed nuts, olives, pate, peanut butter, pickled vegetables, pickles, pork rinds, potato chips, tomato puree, salad dressings, sausages, salmon, trout, processed sunflower seeds, processed pumpkin seeds, processed edible seeds, soup mixes, soups, processed tomatoes, processed vegetables, watermelon rind | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1994 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |