USPTO serial 74081525
SCM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1735890Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 1992
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Kalow
DAVID A KALOW LIEBERMAN RUDOLPH & NOWAK292 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | manufacturing chemicals; namely, titanium dioxide used in industry for whitening agents, opacifiers, fillers, fiber delustering, ultra violet light absorbers, preservatives against rust and the deterioration of wood; tempering substances and catalysts, used in the manufacture of paints, coatings, pigments, cosmetics, paper, ink, plastics, glass, vitreous enamels, porcelains, rubber products, mordants and natural resins, photographic chemicals, flue gas and fire extinguishing compositions, foodstuffs, tanning substances and titanium metals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1967 |
| 002 | titanium pigments used as coloring matters and dyestuffs in industry and used in the manufacture of paints, coatings, pigments, varnishes, lacquers and distempering substances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1967 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCM CHEMICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCM CHEMICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCM CHEMICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named SCM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |