USPTO serial 74081779
CENTRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CENTRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur T. Fattibene
ARTHUR T FATTIBENE2480 POST RDSOUTHPORT, CT 06490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | dental devices for containing or applying dental material to teeth | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |