USPTO serial 74082765
ARROZENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARROZENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN H. HARTMAN
STEVEN H HARTMAN C/O NABISCO, INCP O BOX 311PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-0311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | food products and ingredients namely cookies, cake mix, prepared flour, rice flour, macaroni, pasta, sweetened flavored gelatin, coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes, flour, and processed cereals; bread, biscuits, cakes, pastry and flavored, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder: salt, mustard, pepper, vinegar, sauces, spices; ice; and crackers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |