USPTO serial 74082866
PYTHON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANVILLE, ANNA W.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PYTHON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel B. Stone
JAMES W GERIAK LYON & LYON611 W SIXTH ST 34TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automotive anti-theft security devices sold as a unit; namely, electronic sensors, electronic high sound level generators, electric sirens, and remote control transmitters and receivers | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |