USPTO serial 74082879
FRESH PACK KEEPS AIR OUT AND FRESHNESS IN! DOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1917383Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 5, 1995
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FRESH PACK KEEPS AIR OUT AND FRESHNESS IN! DOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DOLE DRIED FRUIT AND NUT COMPANY
Fresno, CA
DOLE DRIED FRUIT AND NUT COMPANY
Fresno, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria S. Cefalu
MARIA S CEFALU LIMBACH & LIMBACH2001 FERRY BLDGSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared nuts, preserved fruits, dried fruits, stewed fruits, frosted fruits, crystallized fruits, fruit salads, fruit pulp, fruit peel, all sold in an airtight package | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOLE DRIED FRUIT AND NUT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by DOLE DRIED FRUIT AND NUT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named FRESH PACK KEEPS AIR OUT AND FRESHNESS IN! DOLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 30, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |