Drawing for INTELBEE

USPTO serial 74083806

INTELBEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLINGTON, THOMAS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELBEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Jordan

FRANK J JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG122 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007power driven hand tools, namely, pneumatic drills, pneumatic hammers, grinders, sanders, taps, electric drills, electric hammers, screwdrivers, nut runners, buffers, polishers, wrenches and machine operated jacks; separators for selective physical separation of mixed solids; solids-liquid separators; pumps; namely, centrifugal pumps, reciprocating pumps, rotary pumps, axial flow pumps, mixed flow pumps, vacuum pumps, reciprocating vacuum pumps, rotary vacuum pumps and diffuser pumps; reciprocating gas compressors; rotary gas compressors; axial flow gas compressors; turbo gas compressors; belts for engines and motors other than land vehicle engines and motorsACTIVE—
009automated gasoline dispensing apparatus for use in gasoline stationsACTIVE—
011heating and air conditioning equipment, namely, heat regenerators, evaporators and centrifugal blowers; electric fans; electric heaters; electric air conditioning units; refrigerators, dust collection units for industrial useACTIVE—
012belts for engines of land vehicles; torque converters for land vehicles; land motor vehicles, namely, trucks, automobiles, buses and vansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 1999ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 19981.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 17, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 21, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 28, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 27, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 1996REINREINSTATED—
Sep 26, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 1996UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 4, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 20, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 17, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance