USPTO serial 74083806
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Nakano-ku, Tokyo, JP
Nakano-ku, Tokyo, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Jordan
FRANK J JORDAN JORDAN AND HAMBURG122 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power driven hand tools, namely, pneumatic drills, pneumatic hammers, grinders, sanders, taps, electric drills, electric hammers, screwdrivers, nut runners, buffers, polishers, wrenches and machine operated jacks; separators for selective physical separation of mixed solids; solids-liquid separators; pumps; namely, centrifugal pumps, reciprocating pumps, rotary pumps, axial flow pumps, mixed flow pumps, vacuum pumps, reciprocating vacuum pumps, rotary vacuum pumps and diffuser pumps; reciprocating gas compressors; rotary gas compressors; axial flow gas compressors; turbo gas compressors; belts for engines and motors other than land vehicle engines and motors | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | automated gasoline dispensing apparatus for use in gasoline stations | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | heating and air conditioning equipment, namely, heat regenerators, evaporators and centrifugal blowers; electric fans; electric heaters; electric air conditioning units; refrigerators, dust collection units for industrial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | belts for engines of land vehicles; torque converters for land vehicles; land motor vehicles, namely, trucks, automobiles, buses and vans | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |