USPTO serial 74083810
TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David T. Nikaido
DAVID T NIKAIDO NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, MURRY & ORAMMETROPOLITAN SQ STE 330 G ST655 15TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | human pharmaceuticals; namely, ulcer treatments, anti-tumor agents, gastroenteric agents, conraceptives, anti-inflammatories, analgesics, steroids, electrolytes, anti-asthmatic agents, and beta lactamase inhibitors; and herbal medicines; namely, herbal pain relievers, herbal cold remedies, herbal anti-inflammatories, herbal ulcer treatments, herbal beverages, vitamin preparations and liquid nutrient supplement preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | health foods; namely, liquid nutrient preparations, herbal beverages, and vitamin preparations | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | health foods; namely, herbal beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | health foods; namely, liquid nutrient preparations, herbal beverages, and vitamin preparations | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Taiho Alberta Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |