USPTO serial 74083941
ATMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASH, LAURA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Morrison
THOMAS R MORRISON142 N COLUMBUS AVEMOUNT VERNON, NY 10553UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | paints, varnishes, enamels, primers and coating materials, sealing composition, natural resins, resurfacing materials for interior household use | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | polishing, scouring and cleaning preparations, abrasive preparations and liquid drain cleaner for household use | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | mastics, pastes, epoxy resin, and silicone for repairing, stopping or insulating, caulking compound and pipe jointing compounds for sealing cracks, for sealing pipe threads and for preventing leakage and rusting; sealing and caulking for stopping leakage form gas holders, oil tanks, water tanks and from similar containers; gaskets and packings (jointings) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 31, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |