Drawing for JOSEPH PHELPS VIN DU MISTRAL

USPTO serial 74085389

JOSEPH PHELPS VIN DU MISTRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1686638Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 12, 1992
Examiner
PRICE, JERRY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with JOSEPH PHELPS VIN DU MISTRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Slavick

Scott J. Slavick Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP200 West Madison Street, Suite 3900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wineACTIVEAug 17, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2021NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2021RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 13, 202189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 13, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2021E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 9, 2019CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2019EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 29, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
Mar 29, 2012RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 29, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 28, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 4, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 8, 2001RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 8, 200189AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 21, 200189AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Dec 18, 1997C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 14, 1997815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 27, 1997PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
May 16, 1997815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 12, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 21, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 1991IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 15, 1991AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 15, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 7, 1991IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 1991IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Jul 3, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 1991IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 17, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance