USPTO serial 74085422
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Murray
ROBERT B MURRAY NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN, MURRAY & ORAMMETROPOLITAN SQ STE 330-G ST LOBBY655 15TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | human pharmaceuticals; namely, ulcer treatment, anti-tumor agents, gastroenteric agents, contraceptives, anti-inflammatories, analgesics, steroids, electrolytes, anti-asthmatic agents, anti-infectives, anti-fungals, anti-allergy agents, anti-CNS disorder drugs, immunologics and beta lactamase inhibitors; liquid nutrient supplement preparations; vitamin preparations; and herbal medicines; namely, herbal pain relivevers, herbal cold remedies, herbal anti-inflammatories, herbal ulcer treatments and herbal beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | herbal beverages; namely, tea for non medicinal purposes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |