USPTO serial 74085461
Serial No. 74085461
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1854328Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 1994
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 74085461?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN ANTONIO, TX
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
SAN ANTONIO, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL C. VAN SLYKE
PAUL C VAN SLYKE Hoover Slovacek LLPP. O. Box 4547HOUSTON, TX 77210-4547UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consulting services in the establishment, operation, and maintenance of deer farms and deer herds | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 2, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETTY GROUP, LLP
- Other trademarks owned by HEART-BAR DEER FARM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HEART-BAR DEER FARM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HEART-BAR DEER FARM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PETTY RANCH COMPANY LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |