USPTO serial 74085655
THE PORTABLES DEMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1972047Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 1996
- Examiner
- RICH, NORMAN J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE PORTABLES DEMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAY - 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ODC EXHIBIT SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ODC EXHIBIT SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ODC EXHIBIT SYSTEMS LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE PORTABLES DEMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |