USPTO serial 74085842
FIBER BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 8, 1992
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FIBER BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin F. Majestic
MARTIN F MAJESTIC MAJESTIC, PARSONS, SIEBERT & HSUEFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 1450SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary food supplement | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 21, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 8, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |