Drawing for PIN UP GIRL

USPTO serial 74086441

PIN UP GIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIN UP GIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fernanda M. Fiordalisi

FERNANDA M FIORDALISI BUCKNAM AND ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY LONG ISLAND, NY 11530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025suits and dresses made of leather; fur coats; tailored suits; frocks, dresses, shirts, blouses, skirts, coats, trousers, vests, jerseys, pajamas, shoes, and stockings, petticoats, slippers, hats, scarves, belts, neck ties, raincoats, overcoats, greatcoats, bathing costumes, sports overalls, wind resistant jackets, ski pantsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 3, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 7, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 4, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 5, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 5, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance