USPTO serial 74086774
MYDATA AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYDATA AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
161 70 Bromma, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Clayton
MICHAEL F CLAYTON MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS1800 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | programmable machines and equipment for simultaneous automated assembly of printed circuit boards according to instructions pre-recorded on magnetic media; namely, equipment for automated selection, mounting, visual inspection, electrical verification and dimensional and mechanical testing of the constituent electrical and electronic components of such printed circuit boards, parts and fittings as well as tools for the above mentioned machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | magnetic data carriers and data processing equipment for the storage of instructions to enable simultanous automated assembly of printed circuit boards and to enable automated selection, mounting and visual inspection, electrical verification and dimensional and mechanical testing of the constituent electrical and electronic components of such printed circuit boards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |