USPTO serial 74088110
BEACH STREET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEACH STREET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NIMS HOWES, COLLISION & ISNER
NIMS, HOWES, COLLISION & HANSEN LACKERT605 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | beach accessories; namely, beach coverups | ABANDONED | May 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |